Saturday, July 4, 2015

The Science Behind Sparklers

Independence Day Weekend Links

Happy Fourth of July!  Here are a few stories to light up your weekend:

My Hometown Baseball Stadium Just Burned Down. It Was My Childhood-and an American Relic - Slate.  Eugene, Oregon's Civic Stadium, which was built as a public-private partnership involving the WPA.

A Long Walk's End - SBNation

Royals All Star Voting Echoes Last Time MLB Fans Stuffed The Ballot Box - All Things Considered.  Cincinnati, 1957.

What the worst bird flu outbreak in U.S. history means for farms - Fortune

White House: We Have a Beef With GMO Regulations - The Salt.  I think they are a bit late on this.

The U.S. Is Producing a Record Amount of Milk and Dumping the Leftovers - Bloomberg.

The Father-Son Feud That Built an Empire of Food - Narratively

Raisin Grower Wins Supreme Court Battle - Modern Farmer.  It will be interesting how a massive raisin surplus is dealt with going forward.

How Did President Zachary Taylor Actually Die? - priceonomics

How a Conservative Billionaire is Moving Heaven and Earth to Become the Biggest Alternative Energy Giant in the Country - Pacific Standard

The Missing Diamond Shortage - Bloomberg

Whistle-blower: How doctor uncovered nightmare - Detroit News

The Mystery of St. Louis's Veiled Prophet - The Atlantic.  The weird roots of Fair St. Louis.  A look at power dynamics in St. Louis history.

Seattle on the Mediterranean - New York Times

What's Killing the Babies of Vernal, Utah? - Rolling Stone.  Some blame tremendous air pollution resulting from natural gas production in the basin.

Why the Christian right is going to war (with itself) - Salon

Anti-Intellectualism Is Killing America - Psychology Today

Major League Baseball Players Born Abroad - The Big Picture



When In The Course of Human Events...

I love this annual tradition:

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Monday, June 29, 2015

Heeding the Doctor's Advice

The Atlantic takes a look at alcohol-related medical advice of Benjamin Rush, signer of the Declaration of Independence:
Go ahead, have a small beer; it will bring “Serenity of Mind, Reputation, Long Life, & Happiness.” Even a strong beer would be fine, for that brings “Cheerfulness, Strength, and Nourishment,” as long as it’s only sipped at meals. So declared Benjamin Rush, one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence and the early republic’s most prominent physician. In his loquaciously named pamphlet, An Inquiry Into the Effects of Ardent Spirits on the Human Mind and Body, first published in 1784, Rush describes the “usual” downward spiral of drink. What starts as water and wine quickly turns into punches and toddies and cordials, ending with a hopeless vortex of gin, brandy, and rum, “day and night.”* In the pits of intemperance, one can expect such vices as “Idleness, Gaming, peevishness, quarrelling, Fighting, Horse-Racing, Lying and Swearing, Stealing and Swindling, Perjury, Burglary, [and] Murder,” with punishments including “Black eyes and Bags,” “State prison for Life,” or, worst of all, “Gallows."
Why did this 18th-century doctor care so much about moral consequences of drinking? “It was a pretty common belief among the founders [regarding] America’s experiment with republicanism, that the only way that we were going to keep it was through the virtue of our citizens,” said Bruce Bustard, the curator of a National Archives exhibit on American alcohol consumption. As Rush observed the effects of alcohol consumption, he had the young nation’s future in mind: People experiencing what he saw as the “Melancholy,” “Madness,” and “Despair” of intemperance surely wouldn’t make for very good participants in democracy.
Early America was also a much, much wetter place than it is now, modern frat culture notwithstanding. Instead of binge-drinking in short bursts, Americans often imbibed all day long. “Right after the Constitution is ratified, you could see the alcoholic consumption starting to go up,” said Bustard. Over the next four decades, Americans kept drinking steadily more, hitting a peak of 7.1 gallons of pure alcohol per person per year in 1830. By comparison, in 2013, Americans older than 14 each drank an average of 2.34 gallons of pure alcohol—an estimate which measures how much ethanol people consumed, regardless of how strong or weak their drinks were. Although some colonial-era beers might have been even weaker than today's light beers, people drank a lot more of them.
For once, I'll listen to the doctor.  Just beer for me, I'll leave the whiskey to others.

Sunday, June 28, 2015

Bringing Back the Light

Bringing Back the Light from Mark Wyatt on Vimeo.

NASA Photo of the Day

June 26:

Planet Aurora
Image Credit: Scott Kelly, Expedition 44, NASA
Explanation: What bizarre alien planet is this ? It's planet Earth of course, seen through the shimmering glow of aurorae from the International Space Station. About 400 kilometers (250 miles) above, the orbiting station is itself within the upper realm of the auroral displays, also watched from the planet's surface on June 23rd. Aurorae have the signature colors of excited molecules and atoms at the low densities found at extreme altitudes. The eerie greenish glow of molecular oxygen dominates this view. But higher, just above the space station's horizon, is a rarer red band of aurora from atomic oxygen. The ongoing geomagnetic storm began after a coronal mass ejection's recent impact on Earth's magnetosphere.

The Detroit Playbook

In These Times has an interesting piece about whether "Chicago is the next Detroit," and how Detroit got to where it was:
Detroit’s bankruptcy was not borne out of financial necessity and was not a foregone conclusion. It was a political decision made by state officials. Gov. Rick Snyder and the Michigan Legislature chose to push the distressed city over the edge in order to accomplish two otherwise difficult political goals: slashing pensions and regionalizing the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department. It was disaster capitalism at its finest.
Austerity hawks are now hoping to use the Detroit playbook in other cities to force the public to accept extreme measures to fix budget crises. And the bond markets seem to have finally settled on an answer to that question about which city will be the next Detroit: Chicago. Moody’s Investor Service, one of the three major credit rating agencies, just downgraded Chicago’s credit rating to junk level—the municipal equivalent of a subprime credit score, cautioning potential lenders that the city may not be able to pay them back—making it the lowest-rated major city in the country after Detroit....
During Detroit’s bankruptcy proceedings, Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr, who had been appointed by Snyder to run the city during its fiscal crisis, repeatedly asserted that the city had $18 billion in outstanding debt, so as to imply that the city had to come up with $18 billion in savings to get out of bankruptcy. This was not true.
First of all, that $18 billion number itself was inflated using non-standard accounting assumptions and by including debt that did not actually belong to the city itself, such as the debt of the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department. But more importantly, the $18 billion figure was irrelevant for the purposes of Chapter 9 bankruptcy, since there was never any expectation that the city pay all of its long-term debts immediately. What mattered, according to an analysis by the think-tank Demos, was the $198 million cash flow shortfall that the city faced that fiscal year. Detroit’s expenses were $198 million more than its revenues, so it could not pay its bills as they came due.
The $198 million shortfall could have been addressed fairly easily—in part, simply by undoing state actions that had pushed Detroit into bad financial straits in the first place. For example, Detroit had taken a major financial hit over the course of 2011 and 2012, when Snyder and the Michigan Legislature decided to cut annual state revenue sharing with the city by $67 million. Restoring that funding would have filled one-third of the city’s shortfall. Second, there were state-imposed restrictions on the city’s ability to raise local taxes, dating back to the 1990s. Lifting those restrictions would have allowed the city to raise taxes and bring in new revenue.
Or the legislature could have passed a law requiring suburban employers to automatically deduct city income tax for reverse commuters who lived in Detroit. The city instead had to rely on reverse commuters to voluntarily pay their taxes. According to a study commissioned by the Mayor’s Office, in 2009 alone, Detroit lost $142 million as a result of this loophole. But instead, the $18 billion figure was held up to create a greater sense of urgency in order to justify drastic cuts at the expense of public employees and wrest control of the water department from the city.
It amazes me that politicians (mainly of one party, but often helped by the other) can slash taxes, underfund pensions for decades and massively cut revenue sharing with local governments, then turn around and claim pensions have to be cut because the governments are short of cash to pay those pensions.  Before being able to renege on pension promises, those tax cuts should be rolled back.  However, that's not how the system works.  At this point, anything that can be done to benefit the wealthy and screw the working class will be done, and done as quickly as possible.  It is pretty sad, and it will be depressing to watch this playbook run over and over, but I think that is our future.  To be honest, I think job losses and a shrinking population made a Detroit bankruptcy eventually inevitable, but it was pretty clear that Republicans in Lansing saw their chance to make it happen sooner rather than later.  It will be interesting to see how Chicago plays out.  It is so much better off than Detroit, but it seems the fix is in to screw city employees and reward the well-connected.

Saturday, June 27, 2015

Endless Gravity

Endless Gravity // 14-BIT RAW from Alex Soloviev on Vimeo.

End of June Weekend Links

Well, it's been an interesting week in Charleston and at the Supreme Court.  I'll make a little SCOTUS prediction here: John Roberts will write the majority opinion ruling in favor of the Arizona Legislature in the redistricting case on Monday.  I think he's the Republican political mastermind of the Court, and he knows that gerrymandering and voter suppression are keys to Republican political success.  Take a look at the Obamacare, gay marriage and voting cases in the past few years.  In NFIB v. Sebelius and King v. Burwell, he wrote the majority opinion which saved Obamacare from Republicans, and saved Republicans from themselves.  The Obamacare opposition is a political winner in the sticks, but an actual win would be disastrous for Republicans.  On United States v. Windsor, and Obergefell v. Hodges he writes the dissent for the anti-gay marriage lost cause crowd, winning back some of the conservatives who hated on him for the Obamacare opinions.  Finally, in Shelby County v. Holder, and I believe in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, Roberts will be the majority voice in protecting Republican special interests and minority rule against the onslaught of democracy (he also wrote a concurrence in Citizens United v. FEC, which also massively advantaged ultra-wealthy Republicans and damaged the interests of common citizens) and demographic change, which are the greatest threats to entrenched power.  Interestingly, if that is the case, he'll have argued in three consecutive decision days for the intent of democratically-elected legislators (King), against "activist judges" supposedly short-circuiting the democratic process (Obergefell) and for the supremacy of the legislature in overruling the (most-purely) democratic (referendum) process (Arizona Legislature).  It seems to be pretty flexible logic that continuously advances the power structure of the oligarchy in less-attention grabbing cases while allowing a few bones to be thrown in the direction of social welfare and social progress in the higher profile cases.
Update: Also significant Monday will be how the court rules on Michigan v. EPA.
Further update: I was wrong about the redistricting case, but the Court did rule against EPA.
After that little bit of armchair legal and political analysis, here are some stories I think might be of interest:

The First Pitch: Race, Redemption and American Legion Baseball - Vice Sports

Little League, Big Trouble - SBNation

A Toast To Butter Sculpture, The Art That Melts The Heart Of The Masses - The Salt.  I love me some butter sculpture.

The Sihks who saved Parmesan - BBC

The burger that could fix fast food - Yahoo

Can Craft Beer Survive AB InBev? - Bloomberg

Troubled Delta System Is California's Water Battleground - New York Times and How A Historic Blunder Helped Create The Water Crisis In The West - NPR

How Israel defies drought - Christian Science Monitor

The value of land - Pieria

The Increasing Scarcity of Helium - priceonomics

FedEx's New Electric Trucks Get a Boost From Diesel Turbines - Wired.  From last year, but interesting, and I missed it then.

Silicon Valley is a lie - GQ

L.A. to Nepal: America's first responders, California Task Force Two follows disaster around the world - The California Sunday Magazine

Camming Is Not Like Any Other Kind of Sex Work - The Stranger

Right-Wing Extremism Kills More Americans Than Islamic Terrorism.  So Why Aren't We More Afraid of It - Pacific Standard.  Because white people rarely terrorize white people?

 It Is Accomplished - Andrew Sullivan

Charleston and the Age of Obama - The New Yorker

Boeing Will Pay High Price For McNerney's Mistake of Treating Aviation Like It Was Any Other Industry - Forbes.  Forbes?  Wow.

Where Same-Sex Couples Live - The Upshot.  Northern Wisconsin?  Wouldn't have guessed that (maybe Monty Python's Lumberjack song was on the money).