Timothy Egan
considers Paul Ryan's knowledge of his family's history for St. Patrick's Day:
IN
advance of St. Patrick’s Day, I went time traveling, back to the 1840s
and Ireland’s great famine. On one side of the Irish Sea was Victorian
England, flush with the pomp and prosperity of the world’s mightiest
empire. On the other side were skeletal people, dying en masse, the
hollow-bellied children scrounging for nettles and blackberries.
A
great debate raged in London: Would it be wrong to feed the starving
Irish with free food, thereby setting up a “culture of dependency”?
Certainly England’s man in charge of easing the famine, Sir Charles
Trevelyan, thought so. “Dependence on charity,” he declared, “is not to
be made an agreeable mode of life.”
And
there I ran into Paul Ryan. His great-great-grandfather had fled to
America. But the Republican congressman was very much in evidence,
wagging his finger at the famished. His oft-stated “culture of
dependency” is a safety net that becomes a lazy-day hammock. But it was
also England’s excuse for lethal negligence.....
Ryan’s running mate in 2012, Mitt Romney, made the Tory case with his
infamous remark that 47 percent of Americans are moochers, “dependent
upon government.” Part of that dependence, he said, extended to people
“who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing,
to you name it.” Food — the gall!
You
can’t make these kinds of heartless remarks unless you think the poor
deserve their fate — that they have a character flaw, born of public
assistance. And there hovers another awful haunt of Irish history. In
2012, Ryan said that the network of programs for the American poor made
people not want to work.
On
Wednesday, he went further, using the language of racial coding. This,
after he told a story of a boy who didn’t want his free school lunch
because it left him with “a full stomach and an empty soul.” The story
was garbage — almost completely untrue.
“We
have this tailspin of culture, in our inner cities in particular, of
men not working and just generations of men not even thinking about
working or learning the value and the culture of work.” In other words,
these people are bred poor and lazy.
Where
have I heard that before? Ah, yes — 19th-century England. The Irish
national character, Trevelyan confided to a fellow aristocrat, was
“defective.” The hungry millions were “a selfish, perverse, and
turbulent” people, said the man in charge of relieving their plight.
Egan qualifies his criticism, but the point is clear enough. I know Ryan can empathize with folks. He's made clear that he really feels the pain of rich people who are required to pay taxes on their wealth, but he's shown almost no ability to empathize with people who have been considered a worthless race, just as his forebears were considered by the wealthy English.
Sir Trevelyan, indeed: