Sonari Glinton
visits South Bend, Indiana and looks at the town's attempt to get over the closing of Studebaker nearly 50 years ago:
South Bend is like so many towns in the Midwest: If you look around you can see traces of their former glory.
Near
downtown, there's a Catholic church less than a block from another
Catholic church — one for the Irish and another for the Poles. Sturdy,
low slung houses line the streets, and there's a tavern on almost every
corner.
For many years the leaders of the
town had anything but a vision for South Bend's future. The city lost
about one-third of its population in the years after Studebaker. Last
year, Newsweek put it on its list of America's Dying Cities.
The
town spent years trying to figure what to do and how to get another
Studebaker-type company to fill the hole. Meanwhile, old factory
buildings took up blocks and blocks of real estate as a constant
reminder of what the town had lost.
South Bend is an interesting place, and the old factories at Studebaker did make the town seem almost haunted. I loved the part about the ethnic Catholic churches closer than Subway stores, Dollar Generals or Starbucks today. But the part about the town losing a third of it's population kind of grates on me. That doesn't take into account the effects of suburbanization. Take a look at the data for
St. Joseph County, where South Bend is the county seat:
1900 |
58,881 |
|
38.7% |
1910 |
84,312 |
|
43.2% |
1920 |
103,304 |
|
22.5% |
1930 |
160,033 |
|
54.9% |
1940 |
161,823 |
|
1.1% |
1950 |
205,058 |
|
26.7% |
1960 |
238,614 |
|
16.4% |
1970 |
245,045 |
|
2.7% |
1980 |
241,617 |
|
−1.4% |
1990 |
247,052 |
|
2.2% |
2000 |
265,559 |
|
7.5% |
2010 |
266,931 |
|
0.5% |
Compare that to
South Bend itself (also, look at
Granger, whose Census data makes
Russia, Ohio look like a bunch of poor folks, I mean $80,000 median household income, seriously?):
1900 |
35,999 |
|
65.0% |
1910 |
53,684 |
|
49.1% |
1920 |
70,983 |
|
32.2% |
1930 |
104,193 |
|
46.8% |
1940 |
101,268 |
|
−2.8% |
1950 |
115,911 |
|
14.5% |
1960 |
132,445 |
|
14.3% |
1970 |
125,850 |
|
−5.0% |
1980 |
109,727 |
|
−12.8% |
1990 |
105,511 |
|
−3.8% |
2000 |
107,789 |
|
2.2% |
2010 |
101,168 |
|
−6.1% |
While single-digit growth for the county doesn't look that impressive, it is still growth. From 1930 to 2010, the county population increased nearly 67%. But in 1930, 65% of the county's population resided in South Bend, as compared to 38% in 2010. South Bend may be struggling, but it won't be disappearing from maps anytime soon.