Tuesday, February 7, 2012

The Environmental Impart Of Utility-Scale Solar Power

LA Times:
Construction cranes rise like storks 40 stories above the Mojave Desert. In their midst, the "power tower" emerges, wrapped in scaffolding and looking like a multistage rocket.

Clustered nearby are hangar-sized assembly buildings, looming berms of sand and a chain mail of fencing that will enclose more than 3,500 acres of public land. Moorings for 173,500 mirrors — each the size of a garage door — are spiked into the desert floor. Before the end of the year, they will become six square miles of gleaming reflectors, sweeping from Interstate 15 to the Clark Mountains along California's eastern border.

BrightSource Energy's Ivanpah solar power project will soon be a humming city with 24-hour lighting, a wastewater processing facility and a gas-fired power plant. To make room, BrightSource has mowed down a swath of desert plants, displaced dozens of animal species and relocated scores of imperiled desert tortoises, a move that some experts say could kill up to a third of them.
There are definitely trade-offs in developing large scale renewable power.  We could develop more hydroelectric power, but that is pretty well frowned upon.  Wind turbines kill birds.  First thing people ought to do is try to conserve more energy.  Second thing should probably be to develop more distributed power generation, so as to minimize transmission losses.  Anyway, the story is interesting.

2 comments:

  1. The best distributed power generation strategy is that of Silverado Power. They are by far the most sophisticated PV developer in the utility scale space. Though Brightsource can win the "arms race," they have been observed wildly speculating on technology before modifying their PPA's (illegally) when Thermal didn't pan out.

    Silverado's approach was described here: http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/silverado-powers-different-approach-to-building-solar/

    ReplyDelete