But this has always been Obama. Transformative "bipartisanship" works in elections like 2008, after a genuine national catastrophe, where there are no incumbents. Change wins because any change is mandated. What nobody expected was that he actually believed his bipartisanship line. And he still seems to believe in bipartisan change—despite four years of being called a Muslim Commie Nazi—when he's the incumbent against whom "change" works, when he's seen the Republican leader in the senate literally pledge that his party would lift no finger to create ameliorative legislation, lest it result in Obama's reelection.Obama's greatest failures have been in the lack of financial reform, the increase in use of drones and Bush-era surveillance techniques and the lack of willingness to actually do anything to try to address housing issues and joblessness. Unfortunately for all, the GOP would be even worse on all of these, with a war in Iran on top of it. There has to be a large enough coalition of sensible folks from both parties to overcome the loons and the financial and business titans and their sycophants in each party. Unfortunately, for this to happen, we will probably need the Republicans to be in charge and run the country in the ground even worse, and for average folks to needlessly suffer even worse than they are now. In other words, it will get worse before it gets better.
In 2008, it was just dangerous naiveté. The American right spent eight years under Clinton creating insurrectionary militias in wait for black helicopters, United Nations occupation, one-world socialist government and Clinton becoming Dictator for Life. And Clinton was a white dude from the south who liked doinking plus-sized women with feathered hair. What the fuck did Obama think those people were going to do with a black guy? The only explanation for the persistence of his attitude now is hubris—a dim, ineradicable faith in the transcendence of his own oratory, in spite of the fact that it's a mush-mouthed, knives-out, meathead reality that drafts the budget every year.
Watching the left-wing establishment's response to the debate only confirmed their complicity in what transpired in it. THEY BUILT THIS. They give a token quadrennial handjob to unions, before kicking them back to the curb—then have the audacity to be peeved that their candidate doesn't mention unions in a domestic policy debate. They rely on the fact that women and homosexuals have no other choice—then act stunned that they neither group is used as important leverage in a domestic policy debate. They take cash from the same Wall St. ghouls as the GOP—then seem aghast that a candidate spends no time embracing "the 99%." Well, no shit: to quote the vapid poster they probably tacked up next to Klimt's "The Kiss" in their dorm rooms a thousand years ago, Obama became the change you want to see in the world.
Saturday, October 6, 2012
The Problem With Democrats
Mobutu Sese Seko:
Labels:
Bad Ideas,
Civil society,
Crooks and Liars,
Idiots
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment