Friday, February 17, 2012

The Mystery Metaphysician

Slate reprints a 2001 article from Lingua Franca (h/t Ritholtz):
The next day Zimmerman received a letter from the A.M. Monius Institute. Printed on official-looking stationery and signed by the institute's director, Netzin Steklis, the letter offered Zimmerman a "generous" sum of money to review a sixty-page work of metaphysics titled "Coming to Understanding." As the letter explained, the institute "exists for the primary purpose of disseminating the work 'Coming to Understanding' and encouraging its critical review and improvement." For Zimmerman's philosophical services, the institute was prepared to pay him the astronomical fee of twelve thousand U.S. dollars.
Meanwhile, three thousand miles away in England, the University of Reading philosopher Jonathan Dancy returned from a short vacation to find his house in dire need of repairs. He also discovered a letter waiting for him. "I arrived home thinking that the roof has collapsed and I must do something about it," he remembers. "I wasn't sure how I was going to do it."
Dancy's letter from the A.M. Monius Institute made him the same remarkable offer that had been made to Zimmerman. "I thought, this is very weird," Dancy says. "At first, I thought they were offering me twelve hundred dollars." And the roof? "This was a godsend," he says, "as far as that goes."
Zimmerman and Dancy were not the only scholars who received lucrative offers—and ultimately payment—from the institute. Soon the roster had grown to include at least nine other philosophers: Ermanno Bencivenga of the University of California at Irvine; Jan Cover of Purdue University; John Hawthorne of Syracuse University; Trenton Merricks of the University of Virginia; Eugene Mills of Virginia Common-wealth University; Gideon Rosen of Princeton University; Michael Scriven of Claremont Graduate University; Theodore Sider of Syracuse University; and Ted Warfield of the University of Notre Dame.
The institute's letter claimed that a "very substantial sum" had been earmarked to help contribute to "the revival of traditional metaphysics."
The story is pretty interesting.  They mention Alvin Plantinga a senior philosopher at Notre Dame.  My very interesting Intro to Philo prof came to ND just to study under Plantinga.  Our professor graced us with his proof that a fetus wasn't a part of a woman's body because if it was a male fetus, it had a penis, and females couldn't have penises.  It was the same carrying the fetus around in her womb as if she was carrying a penis around in her pocket.  It wasn't a part of her body.  He called it the "Penis in the pocket" argument.  Philosophy was never something I was going to excel at.

2 comments:

  1. I remember the PIP argument but not the details. Thanks for the refresher, FJ. I also remember being competely relieved to walk out of that class for the last time too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was hoping you might be able to fill in some of the details, because I was trying to come up with a semi-logical explanation of the argument, and was struggling mightily.

    ReplyDelete