What’s the record of the 112th Congress? Well, it almost shut down the government and almost breached the debt ceiling. It almost went over the fiscal cliff (which it had designed in the first place). It cut a trillion dollars of discretionary spending in the Budget Control Act and scheduled another trillion in spending cuts through an automatic sequester, which everyone agrees is terrible policy. It achieved nothing of note on housing, energy, stimulus, immigration, guns, tax reform, infrastructure, climate change or, really, anything. It’s hard to identify a single significant problem that existed prior to the 112th Congress that was in any way improved by its two years of rule.First, do no harm. I think this Congress would fail this. The kicker is that the Tea Party "brain trust claims to be Constitutional scholars. However, my brief knowledge of the Constitution leaves wide power in the hands of Congress to make taxing and spending decisions, and limits the President's power. But the majority in the people's house is scared to lay out their positions and try to work out any deal with the Senate. They prefer to cry and complain and vote against whatever can pass the House with a majority of the minority, and a minority of the majority. They are the perfect example why the Republican party is not fit for governance. Their proposals, like the Ryan budget, are idiotic ideology which would be disowned by any economist with a conscience. And yet, thanks to rural and suburban voters and some very devious map makers, they hold the majority. I guess we'll see if the 113th Congress will be any better than these morons.
The 112th, which was gaveled into being on Jan. 3, 2011, by newly elected House Speaker John Boehner, wasn’t just unproductive in comparison with the 111th. It was unproductive compared with any Congress since 1948, when scholars began keeping tabs on congressional productivity.
When it ends, the 112th Congress will have passed about 220 public laws -- by far the least of any Congress on record. Prior to the 112th, the least productive Congress was the 104th, from January 1995 to January 1997. Not coincidentally, that Congress also featured a new Republican House majority determined to ruin a Democratic president in advance of the next campaign. The 104th, however, passed 333 public laws -- almost 50 percent more than the 112th. The 112th stands alone in its achievement of epic failure.
Of course, raw productivity statistics can mislead. After all, if the 112th Congress’s laws were particularly worthwhile, or if its low productivity reflected a period of political calm and economic growth, the slow rate of legislating might even be a good thing. In this case, however, the raw data mislead in the other direction. The 112th Congress wasn’t merely unproductive: It was devastatingly counterproductive.
The 112th found legislating so difficult that lawmakers repeatedly created artificial deadlines for consequences and catastrophes intended to spur them to act. But like Wile E. Coyote with his endless supply of Acme products, when the 112th set a trap, the only sure bet was that it would explode in its collective face, forcing leaders to construct yet another hair- trigger legislative contraption.
Thursday, January 3, 2013
The Pathetic Republican House
Ezra Klein:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment