Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Are the Republicans Turning Us Into Japan?

Noah Smith says maybe (via Mark Thoma):
This is my big worry about the current crisis. When I think of what might hold down our long-term growth, I think about political-economic equilibria and the quality of our institutions. What if an economic shock is severe enough to knock a country out of a good (but fragile) political-economic equilibrium - where factions basically agree on the need for public good provision and sound macro policy - and into a bad one, where no one can agree on anything?

Casual observation says that this may be what happened to Japan. A prolonged slump (compounded by macro policy mistakes) was followed by decades of political chaos that have seen prime ministers come and go like fashion trends. Gridlock has led to too-low taxes and massive debt, while trade and immigration policies remain stuck in the past. Now, personally, I think Japan's political institutions were never particularly good, but I also think that what virtue they had proved to be fragile to external events.

Looking at our current crisis over the debt ceiling, I can't help but worry that something similar is happening to us. Our nation needs to raise taxes, but we can't. Our infrastructure is falling apart, but we can't fix it. We seem to have reached a political-economic equilibrium in which the Republican Party, either by filibusters or by cyclical election victories, will always have the clout to throttle spending on public goods and prevent the taxes and health-care reform that are needed to close our own unsustainable deficits – and because Republicans are ruled by primary elections in the South and by Grover Norquist, their incentives will not soon align with the nation’s. As our roads and our health care system deteriorate, I am comforted neither by a long-term log-log plot of U.S. GDP nor by the limited usefulness of New Growth Theory.

Mark Thoma argues that long-term-ism is a basically conservative policy stance, since the RBC people and the "structural unemployment" people urge us to ignore stabilization policy and focus on things like lowering taxes. I don't think that's necessarily true, for two reasons. First, just because the long-term is important does not mean that conservative policy ideas are right. Conservatives' main mistake is to ignore market failures; yes, this leads them to ignore stabilization policy, but it also makes them ignore public goods. Second, just because the short-term is important does not mean that the long-term is not. The same political-economic dysfunction that stops us from implementing timely and appropriate stabilization policy also stops us from rebuilding our roads.
I think he makes a very good point.  The GOP was killed in the 2008 election, yet managed to make a 1990's Republican health care reform sound like Stalin had come back from Hell to take over the country.  Then they managed to convince their poorly-informed base to turn out in force in 2010, when Obama's poorly-informed base stayed home, giving them big wins.  They blackmailed Obama (not that he put up much fight) into extending the Bush tax cuts for two more years when much of those tax cuts should have gone by the wayside.  Now  they demand massive spending cuts but refuse to look at any revenue increases.  Even though revenues are at their lowest level versus GDP since 1950, Republicans say they cannot go higher.  None of this makes any sense, unless your goal is to screw 90% of the populace for the benefit of the 10% who don't need any help....oh, I see.

No comments:

Post a Comment