The European Environment Agency Scientific Committee writes that the role of energy from crops like biofuels in curbing warming gases should be measured by how much additional carbon dioxide such crops absorb beyond what would have been absorbed anyway by existing fields, forests and grasslands.I don't think most biofuels are very earth-friendly replacements for fossil fuels, at least not as currently produced. Anyway, this is mainly just inside baseball over in Europe, but I thought it was interesting.
Instead, the European Union has been “double counting” some of the savings, according to the draft opinion, which was prepared by the committee in May and viewed this week by The International Herald Tribune and The New York Times.
The committee said that the error had crept into European Union regulations because of a “misapplication of the original guidance” under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
“The potential consequences of this bioenergy accounting error are immense since it assumes that all burning of biomass does not add carbon to the air,” the committee wrote.
Friday, September 16, 2011
Refiguring Biofuels
NYT, via Ritholtz:
Labels:
Across the Atlantic,
Ag economy,
Peak oil
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment