If, as these examples indicate, both pattern recognition and complex communication are now so amenable to automation, are any human skills immune? Do people have any sustainable comparative advantage as we head ever deeper into the second half of the chessboard? In the physical domain, it seems that we do for the time being. Humanoid robots are still quite primitive, with poor fine motor skills and a habit of falling down stairs. So it doesn't appear that gardeners and restaurant busboys are in danger of being replaced by machines any time soon.Luckily there are stairs into the house, so maybe I'll be protected from being overrun by robots. I like the NASA quote, but they'll probably have to update it to 200-pounds nowadays.
And many physical jobs also require advanced mental abilities; plumbers and nurses engage in a great deal of pattern recognition and problem solving throughout the day, and nurses also do a lot of complex communication with colleagues and patients. The difficulty of automating their work reminds us of a quote attributed to a 1965 NASA report advocating manned space flight: "Man is the lowest-cost, 150-pound, nonlinear, all-purpose computer system which can be mass-produced by unskilled labor."
Monday, October 24, 2011
The Robots Are Coming
The Atlantic on robots and their current limitations:
Labels:
Science and stuff
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment