I don't know, but I found this
thought interesting:
Yanis Varoufakis presents another theory from one of his correesondents:
What had happened was that interbank lending rates were
rising in China. Unlike other credit crunches (e.g. that in Italy now),
this particular credit crunch was effected by the Chinese government for
the purpose of pricking the gigantic speculative bubble in China before
it inflates further with devastating potential. This same bubble is
intimately linked to the US economy: both US finance and the midwest
mining areas of the US are fully involved. Shortly afterwards Chairman
Bernanke started talking about relaxing QE3. If the Chinese government
no longer wants to provide unlimited liquidity then the whole burden of
sustaining the bubble would fall on the Fed. Mr Bernanke considers this
to be far too dangerous and for this reason he may have brought forward
the Fed’s exit from QE. In this reading, the Fed’s signal that it is
exiting QE has nothingto do with the actual health of the US economy and
everything to do with China’s economic situation and government
intentions.
If I understand the concept of bubbles, I would assume that agriculture is part of the "midwest mining areas of the US." If this interpretation is right, farmers might get pummeled. An if anybody doubts the "end of the commodity supercycle" story, there
sure have been a lot of mention about commodity prices with the Chinese slowdown:
Caterpillar is high on the list of American companies that could
suffer in a Chinese credit crunch. If big Chinese firms can’t get easy
money, there will be less mining and construction, which is bad for CAT
and ultimately, the nearby Italian joint.
But the fuller picture is bigger and more complex. Tighter credit
could mean Chinese firms have much less to spend on raw materials that
power their businesses. “It also means cheaper commodities and long-run,
that might not be such a bad thing,” says FTN Financial chief economist
Chris Low, who has spent time in China.
That could mean lower energy costs for American consumers and
businesses. Tighter lending in China will hurt banks there, but not
necessarily Chinese consumers. A credit crunch could accelerate China’s
transition to an economy relying less on big projects funded with cheap
money, and more on Chinese consumers buying things, including American
stuff.
I think it will take some tremendous weather setbacks to overcome the mindset, if not even the reality of the commodity markets. Even if China can pull through the credit crunch without major pain, the storyline underlying the commodities markets for the past five years is dead.
No comments:
Post a Comment