I would have to side with Daneil. Bush didn't strike me as a person who wanted to hear what the other side of the issue was, and consider whether his opinion might not be correct. He seemed to me to consider rather who the person holding the other opinion was, and if it was somebody he already didn't care for, he'd dismiss it out of hand. His circle of advisors gave him his information, and nobody else could break through that. We only got decent policy discussions when his advisors didn't agree, and he had to choose between them. Sometimes he chose well, (Rice versus Cheney and Rumsfeld in his second term) and sometimes poorly (Cheney and Rumsfeld versus Powell on troop levels to invade Iraq). I guess at times I can dismiss an argument out of hand, but I try to read opposing views on occasion. For instance, I want to read Amity Shlaes' The Forgotten Man, to take a look at her attack on the success of the New Deal, but I don't really want her to benefit, so I'll probably get it at the library. I flipped through it at the library the other day, but I just couldn't put that money in her pocket. I mad that mistake with Larry Schweikart's A Patriot's History of the United States, and I won't make that mistake again.But I think people caricatured the president, and the only thing that I couldn’t understand is why this man with such a curious mind, who in briefings always asked the question you wish you thought of, why that quality didn’t come across. And I fully admit that it didn’t come across. ~Condoleeza RiceI suppose it’s possible that George W. Bush could have had “such a curious mind” and still made all the terrible decisions that he did, but one of the reasons that he received a reputation for being incurious is that he overlooked such obvious, glaring flaws in his administration’s policies that someone with “such a curious mind” should have noticed. He wasn’t very good at demonstrating that he knew or cared to know very much about things. If Bush were as curious as Rice claims, he did an amazing job of hiding it.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Was President Bush Curious?
Daniel Larison:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment