NYT:
Scientists
and biotechnology companies are developing what could become the next
powerful weapon in the war on pests — one that harnesses a Nobel
Prize-winning discovery to kill insects and pathogens by disabling their
genes.
By
zeroing in on a genetic sequence unique to one species, the technique
has the potential to kill a pest without harming beneficial insects.
That would be a big advance over chemical pesticides.
“If
you use a neuro-poison, it kills everything,” said Subba Reddy Palli,
an entomologist at the University of Kentucky who is researching the
technology, which is called RNA interference. “But this one is very
target-specific.”
But
some specialists fear that releasing gene-silencing agents into fields
could harm beneficial insects, especially among organisms that have a
common genetic makeup, and possibly even human health. The controversy
echoes the larger debate over genetic modification of crops that has
been raging for years. The Environmental Protection Agency, which
regulates pesticides, will hold a
meeting of scientific advisers on Tuesday to discuss the potential risks of RNA interference.
“To
attempt to use this technology at this current stage of understanding
would be more naïve than our use of DDT in the 1950s,” the National
Honey Bee Advisory Board said in comments submitted to the E.P.A. before
the meeting, at the agency’s conference center in Arlington, Va.
There has already been a mishap:
One
laboratory study
by scientists at the University of Kentucky and the University of
Nebraska, for instance, found that a double-stranded RNA intended to
silence a rootworm gene also affected a gene in the ladybug, killing
that beneficial insect.
Concerns about possible human health effects were ignited by a
2011 paper
by researchers at Nanjing University in China. They reported that
snippets of RNA produced naturally by rice could be detected in the
blood of people and mice who consumed the rice and could even affect a
gene that regulates cholesterol. Such a “cross kingdom” effect would be
extraordinary and was met with skepticism. At least three studies
subsequently challenged the findings.
As if
ladybugs haven't already had a hard time recently. I'm open to new science in pest control, but I don't want to see us rush into a major cockup. Monsanto has enough enemies already.
No comments:
Post a Comment