In this framework, shifting geographic patterns of wealth can cause booms and busts in far-away places. For example, as the center of global economic activity shifts from Europe to Asia, it may make less sense to locate a bunch of heavy industry in, say, Michigan (which is ideally positioned to supply things to America's Europe-facing East Coast).His discussion about a weaker dollar earlier in the piece, which leads to more manufacturing (and ag) exports, didn't mention one of the reasons opponents (or just average people) want a stronger dollar, which is oil prices go up with a weak dollar, and we have to import lots and lots of oil. We need to drastically cut the usage of oil, just to allow us to get closer to a trade balance, and greater population density would help.
The thing is, on a global level the U.S. itself doesn't make a natural "core." We have a lot of land, and not a lot of people on that land; geographically, we look a lot more like your average resource-producing country (say, Argentina) than your average manufacturing powerhouse (say, Brazil). Yes, the U.S. has some pockets of high density, and yes, the existence of tradable services complicates the picture. But if you read the news, you hear all the time about companies relocating production to Asia to (hopefully) take advantage of the huge new Asian consumer markets. That is economic geography in action.
If we want to bolster our manufacturing sector over the long run - whether to give us a better way to fight recessions, or to allow us to continue to benefit from industrial clustering, we may need to increase our population density over time. This will require that we do two things. First, we have to continue to allow large-scale immigration. Second, we have to make big policy changes to encourage urban density - public transit, high density housing, etc. Basically, the kind of stuff that Ed Glaeser is always recommending that we do. The alternative (and here I exaggerate) may be a steady process of deindustrialization as we revert to being an exporter of corn and coal.
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Can We Revive Manufacturing in the US?
Noah Smith suggests higher population density for the U.S (also via Mark Thoma).:
Labels:
Rust Belt,
Stuff I'm interested in
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment